Home

Featured Videos

Featured Commentary

Featured Book Reviews

Featured Articles

Suggested Reading

Return Home

AHB 101

A Science Timeline

Biotech Patenting

Conflicts of Interest

Hyping Biotech

Bioethics for Sale

Case Study

Research

Resources

News Archive

About Egg Donors

About Us

Contact Us

AHB Networking

The AHB Networker

AHB Student Clubs

Facebook

Networking Project

Links

Get Active!

Egg Donors Project

Human Gene Patents

Human-Animal Embryos

Designer Babies

Commentary, etc.

Current Commentary

Commentary Archive

Archive Feature

Alliance for Humane Biotechnology

Promoting Health Without Harm

SF Chronicle, Letter to Editor:

Don't let paid experts make ethical judgments 1/26/08

Editor - Is it right for anyone to try to create synthetic life? The answer is "yes," says bioethicist Arthur Caplan ("U.S. scientists take a giant step toward the creation of artificial life in the lab," Jan. 25). The "inventor" of artificial life himself, scientist Craig Venter, gave Caplan money (in the form of a grant) to come up with this opinion. Shouldn't an ethicist be the first to recognize what is commonly known as a conflict of interest? And how much money changed hands, for that matter?

Moreover, this ethicist goes one step further in his arrogance. "There is nothing that violates religious restrictions, or God's will" with respect to the pursuit of artificial life, claims Caplan. Not only does Caplan offer us an obviously biased opinion, but he also claims to be able to read God's mind. Amazing.

In any case, Caplan's reputation for integrity is not enough to vouch for the objectivity of his statements. This is too controversial and serious a subject to be left up to bought-and-paid-for "ethical" experts.

NADIA SILVERSHINE San Rafael