Home

Featured Video

Featured Commentary

Featured Book Reviews

Featured Articles

Suggested Reading

Return Home

AHB 101

A Science Timeline

Biotech Patenting

Genetic Determinism

Bioethics for Sale

Archives

Resources

Current Commentary

Commentary Archive

News Archive

Videos

About Us

Donate

Contact Us

Network

AHB Network

The AHB Networker

Facebook

Twitter

Networking

Links

The Issues

Synthetic Biology

Biotech Safety

Genetic Privacy

Designer Babies

Human-Animal Embryos

Egg Donors Project

Egg Donor Project

Consider These Women

Eggsploitation

Sign Egg Donor Petition

Alliance for Humane Biotechnology

Alliance for Humane Biotechnology © 2007 AHB

SF Chronicle, Letter to Editor:

Don't let paid experts make ethical judgments 1/26/08

Editor - Is it right for anyone to try to create synthetic life? The answer is "yes," says bioethicist Arthur Caplan ("U.S. scientists take a giant step toward the creation of artificial life in the lab," Jan. 25). The "inventor" of artificial life himself, scientist Craig Venter, gave Caplan money (in the form of a grant) to come up with this opinion. Shouldn't an ethicist be the first to recognize what is commonly known as a conflict of interest? And how much money changed hands, for that matter?

Moreover, this ethicist goes one step further in his arrogance. "There is nothing that violates religious restrictions, or God's will" with respect to the pursuit of artificial life, claims Caplan. Not only does Caplan offer us an obviously biased opinion, but he also claims to be able to read God's mind. Amazing.

In any case, Caplan's reputation for integrity is not enough to vouch for the objectivity of his statements. This is too controversial and serious a subject to be left up to bought-and-paid-for "ethical" experts.

NADIA SILVERSHINE San Rafael


Copyright 2007 • Alliance for Humane Biotechnology • All rights reserved